Ohio Court of Appeals· 12/15/2022
State v. Orr
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 4515
Syllabus
R.C. 2953.21 R.C. 2953.23 successive petition jurisdiction frivolous conduct. Affirmed. The petitioner failed to set forth the grounds supporting a successive petition for postconviction relief as required under R.C. 2953.23(A), and as a result, the trial court lacked jurisdiction to consider the merits of the argument.
Judges: S. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. CalhounOhio Supreme Court· 1999-09-01· cited 1,479×
- State v. Apanovitch (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-11-29· cited 208×
- State v. Broom (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-16· cited 55×
- State v. KaneOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-09-26· cited 42×
- State v. OrrOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-10-23· cited 35×
- State ex rel. Lipinski v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, Probate Div.Ohio Supreme Court· 1995-11-01· cited 29×
- State ex rel. Flower v. RockerOhio Supreme Court· 1977-12-14· cited 24×
- State ex rel. McGirr v. Winkler (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-10-05· cited 13×
- State v. OrrOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-21· cited 5×
- Calhoun v. CalhounOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-02-27· cited 3×
- State v. JeffersonOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-04· cited 2×
- State v. OrrOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-10-09· cited 2×
- State v. McGrawOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-04-21· cited 2×
- State ex rel. Orr v. CorriganOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-11-02· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.