State ex rel. Orr v. Corrigan
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 3924
Syllabus
Writ of procedendo R.C. 2969.25 motion to dismiss Civ.R. 12(B)(6) Crim.R. 43 R.C. 2945.02 stay/continuance open court R.C.2945.71 R.C. 2945.71 Sup.R. 40 Crim.R. 50 adequate remedy at law. Relator's complaint for writ of procedendo was dismissed for failure to state a claim where relator failed to demonstrate a right to the requested relief or that respondent, in a bench trial, had a duty to journalize a continuance at the conclusion of the evidentiary phase of trial in order for respondent to deliberate before announcing the verdict. Relator also could have raised this issue in his direct appeal but did not, precluding relief in procedendo.
Judges: Celebrezze
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. LeeOhio Supreme Court· 1976-12-15· cited 162×
- State ex rel. Neff v. CorriganOhio Supreme Court· 1996-03-01· cited 99×
- State ex rel. Culgan v. CollierOhio Supreme Court· 2013-05-02· cited 70×
- State Ex Rel. Village of Richfield v. LariaOhio Supreme Court· 2014-01-24· cited 42×
- State v. OrrOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-10-23· cited 35×
- State ex rel. Daniels v. RussoOhio Supreme Court· 2018-12-26· cited 34×
- State ex rel. West v. PriceOhio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 8×
- State ex rel. Pointer v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-09-21· cited 5×
- State ex rel. Bey v. Loomis (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-06-23· cited 4×
- McDougald v. Kuhn (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-10-20· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.