State v. Orr

Citations

• 2020 Ohio 4913

Syllabus

App.R. 26(B) application to reopen, Civ.R. 60(B), untimely, good cause, lack of transcripts, successive petitions, and res judicata. This court denied an App.R. 26(B) application to reopen as untimely, successive, and barred by res judicata. Lack of transcripts does not state good cause. Successive applications are not allowed. Applicant had previous opportunities to raise the subject issue and had done so. Res judicata bars this application. Civil procedure remedies generally do not apply at the appellate level.