State v. Orozco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “An issue raised for the first time in a reply brief is generally too late to warrant consideration.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State Of Washington v. James Lee O'neil, Jr.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2017-04-03· cited 10×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Berger v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1935-04-15· cited 4,581×
• Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. Bosley
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-04-16· cited 1,592×
• State v. Stenson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1997-07-24· cited 921×
• Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1980-04-28· cited 658×
• State v. Finch
  Washington Supreme Court· 1999-05-06· cited 412×
• Commonwealth v. Lutes
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-02-27· cited 275×
• PUD DISTRICT NO. 1, KLICKITAT COUNTY v. International Insurance Co.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1994-10-06· cited 232×
• State v. Kinneman
  Washington Supreme Court· 2005-09-08· cited 136×
• State v. Tobin
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-09-13· cited 119×
• Commonwealth v. Eskridge
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-03-19· cited 59×
• State v. Ramos
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1996-09-16· cited 26×
• State v. Vicuna
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2003-11-03· cited 23×
• State v. Orozco
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2008-03-17· cited 13×
• State v. Schmitt
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-12-14· cited 12×
• Almquist v. Finley School District No. 53
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-11-21· cited 7×