Commonwealth v. Lutes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that if the appellant fails to comply with Pa.R.A.P 2119(f), Superior Court may entertain discretionary sentencing claim if Commonwealth does not P. 2119(f)
• holding that, if the Commonwealth does not object to the appellant’s failure to comply with Pa.R.A.P. 2119(f), the Superior Court may entertain the discretionary sentencing claim
• holding that the trial court did not err in denying a motion to disqualify the district attorney’s office and no conflict of interest existed where the victim was a county commissioner
• holding that the trial court did not err in denying a motion to disqualify the district attorney’s office and no conflict of interest existed where the victim was a county commissioner
• holding that the trial court did not err in denying a motion to disqualify the district attorney’s office and no conflict of interest existed where the victim was a county commissioner
• holding that if the appellant fails to comply with Pa.R.A.P 2119(f), Superior Court may entertain discretionary sentencing claim if Commonwealth does not object to the appellant’s failure to comply with Pa.R.A.P. 2119(f)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).