State v. O'NEIL

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he [VBR] abrogated a defendant‟s right under Rule 15[, Ariz. R. Crim. P.,] to interview or otherwise seek discovery from an unwilling victim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State Ex Rel. Romley v. Superior Court
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-05-18· cited 78×
• State v. Roscoe
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1996-02-29· cited 53×
• Norgord v. State Ex Rel. Berning
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-09-11· cited 35×
• State v. Fields
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-10-18· cited 28×
• State Ex Rel. Dean v. City Court of City of Tucson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-04-30· cited 15×
• State v. Riggs
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-10-21· cited 6×
• State of Arizona v. Robert Arthur Ergonis
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-06-14

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Weatherford v. Bursey
  Supreme Court· 1977-02-22· cited 1,807×
• State v. Warner
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-12-21· cited 28×
• Goode v. Alfred
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-05-05· cited 4×