Skip to main content

State v. Fields

Citations

  • 2 P.3d 670
  • 196 Ariz. 580

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the superior court abused its discretion when ordering the State to allow defendants access to the crime lab because defendants failed to show substantial need for such evidence
  • explaining a superior court abuses its discretion in a discovery ruling if it misapplies the law or relies on irrational grounds
  • under Rule 15.1(e), providing for additional material or information “not otherwise covered by Rule 15.1,” the person seeking disclosure bears the burden of proof to obtain disclosure
  • information is discoverable if “it could lead to admissible evidence or would be admissible itself”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Espinosa, Brammer, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.