State v. Olson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A district court’s concern over trial calendar management does not necessarily constitute manifest necessity allowing a defendant to be tried twice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Washington
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 2002-03-01· cited 52×
• People v. Kimble
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2017-12-15· cited 3×
• State v. Hunter
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2012-07-02· cited 2×

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Arizona v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1978-02-21· cited 2,314×
• Illinois v. Somerville
  Supreme Court· 1973-02-27· cited 1,368×
• Gori v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 679×
• State v. Lothenbach
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-08-29· cited 192×
• State v. Fuller
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-10-11· cited 120×
• Rairdon v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-12-12· cited 76×
• Roby v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-05-05· cited 75×
• Hodgson v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-12-15· cited 71×
• Evelyn Louise Long v. Hubert H. Humphrey, III
  Eighth Circuit· 1999-07-14· cited 62×
• State v. Fagerstrom
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1970-03-13· cited 49×
• In Re Welfare of T. D. F.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-09-23· cited 26×
• State v. Gwara
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-11-12· cited 19×
• City of Minneapolis v. Price
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-06-14· cited 18×
• State v. Miller
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-07-24· cited 18×
• State v. Long
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-04-24· cited 18×
• State v. White
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-06-11· cited 12×