Skip to main content

State v. Fuller

Citations

  • 374 N.W.2d 722
  • 1985 Minn. LEXIS 1203

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “as the highest court of this state, we are independently responsible for safeguarding the rights of [our] citizens” (alternation in original) (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • discussing how the state and federal double jeopardy clauses are “textually identical.”
  • the Minnesota Supreme Court reversed a Court of Appeals decision where the lower court had barred retrial based on a prosecutorial duty to properly instruct witnesses
  • the Minnesota Supreme Court reversed a Court of Appeals decision where the lower court had barred retrial based on a prosecutorial duty to properly instruct witnesses
  • state courts may find greater protection of individual rights under state constitutions than under the federal constitution
  • the Minnesota Supreme Court reversed a court of appeals decision wherethe lower court had barred retrial based on a prosecutorial duty to properly instruct witnesses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peterson, Kelly, Wahl, Yetka

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

71 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.