Skip to main content

State v. Olson

Citations

  • 872 P.2d 64
  • 74 Wash. App. 126
  • 1994 Wash. App. LEXIS 204

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating power consumption was twice normal usage did not materially affect probable cause and was not shown to be a reckless or intentional misstatement
  • stating power consumption was twice normal usage did not materially affect probable cause and was not shown to be a reckless or intentional misstatement
  • where deficiency in notice of appeal is one of form only, court is not deprived of jurisdiction
  • ability to recognize the odor of both growing and burning marijuana could be inferred from statements that the officer had attended courses on controlled substance investigations and had participated in numerous controlled substance investigations, including marijuana investigations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Webster

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.