State v. Slanaker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Supreme Court has stated that \`[d]iligence is a fact and not a conclusion'\ (quoting State v. Fackrell, 44 Wash.2d 874, 880, 271 P.2d 679 (1954), and citing State v. O'Brien, 66 Wash. 219, 224, 119 P. 609 (1911))
• noting that the Supreme Court has stated that “ ‘[diligence is a fact and not a conclusion’ ” (quoting State v. Fackrell, 44 Wn.2d 874, 880, 271 P.2d 679 (1954), and citing State v. O’Brien, 66 Wash. 219, 224, 119 P. 609 (1911))
• appellant's failure to properly assign error may be excused when the nature of the challenge is perfectly clear
• appellant’s failure to properly assign error may be excused when the nature of the challenge is perfectly clear

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).