Ohio Court of Appeals· 12/22/2022
State v. Olman
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 4678
Syllabus
Application for reopening App.R. 26(B)(5) information which is not record evidence cannot be the basis for reopening a direct appeal no genuine issue as to whether counsel was deficient State v. Leyh, 166 Ohio St.3d 365, 2022-Ohio-292, 185 N.E.3d 1075.
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court· 1983-07-05· cited 7,925×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court· 1993-01-25· cited 3,956×
- State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court· 1995-07-26· cited 1,439×
- State v. IshmailOhio Supreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 940×
- State v. HartmanOhio Supreme Court· 2001-10-03· cited 346×
- State v. Leyh (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-02-08· cited 76×
- State v. TenaceOhio Supreme Court· 2006-06-28· cited 51×
- In re G.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-12-21· cited 4×
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-10-24· cited 3×
- State v. OlmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-06-30· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.