Court of Appeals of Arizona· 5/30/2002
State v. O'DELL
Citations
- 46 P.3d 1074
- 202 Ariz. 453
- 375 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
- 2002 Ariz. App. LEXIS 81
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he state is required to disclose all plainly exculpatory evidence within its possession and violates due process if it fails to do so.”
- “The mere possibility that destroyed evidence could have exculpated a defendant is insufficient to establish a due process violation, as there has been no showing of prejudice to the defendant.”
- noting “the reliability of the Intoxilyzer 5000”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howard, Espinosa, Druke
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SpeerArizona Supreme Court· 2009-07-24· cited 45×
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-05-28· cited 38×
- State v. WombleArizona Supreme Court· 2010-07-12· cited 17×
- State of Arizona v. Robert Charles GlissendorfCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-09-30· cited 7×
- State v. EsserCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-05-23· cited 5×
- State v. MartinsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-09-22· cited 5×
- O'Dell v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2003-10-06
- State of Arizona v. John William JacksonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-05-28
- State of Arizona v. John Robert EsserCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-05-23
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,405×
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court· 1989-01-23· cited 3,366×
- United States v. CoppaSecond Circuit· 2001-10-05· cited 220×
- State v. WillitsArizona Supreme Court· 1964-06-11· cited 207×
- Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court· 1983-12-15· cited 145×
- State v. DunlapCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-09-05· cited 108×
- Fuenning v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court· 1983-12-15· cited 92×
- State v. RosengrenCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-11-16· cited 76×
- State v. YoungbloodArizona Supreme Court· 1993-01-07· cited 70×
- Baca v. SmithArizona Supreme Court· 1979-11-27· cited 68×
- United States v. DumasFirst Circuit· 2000-03-13· cited 67×
- Scales v. City Court of City of MesaArizona Supreme Court· 1979-04-18· cited 63×
- Montano v. Superior Court Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court· 1986-06-10· cited 60×
- MacK v. CruikshankCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-09-16· cited 50×
- State v. BocharskiArizona Supreme Court· 2001-05-03· cited 39×
- State v. VelascoArizona Supreme Court· 1990-09-19· cited 33×
- State v. HackmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-05-23· cited 30×
- State Ex Rel. Dean v. City CourtArizona Supreme Court· 1990-03-26· cited 23×
- State v. RaschCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-10-29· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.