Court of Appeals of Arizona· 10/29/1996
State v. Rasch
Citations
- 935 P.2d 887
- 188 Ariz. 309
- 228 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 25
- 1996 Ariz. App. LEXIS 230
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[A] double jeopardy issue is not ‘ripe’ until the defendant is prosecuted following a mistrial.”
- incorrect cause number not jurisdictional
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Toci, Garbarino, Weisberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Giddins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-05-12· cited 24×
- State of Arizona v. Austin Garrett HansenCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-03-10· cited 18×
- State v. O'DELLCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-05-30· cited 17×
- Schwab v. Ames Const.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-01-27· cited 5×
- State v. BotkinCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-02-10· cited 1×
- State v. BurrCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-05-07
- State of Arizona v. Alyssa Marie BurrCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-05-07
- State of Arizona v. Andres SanchezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2023-09-29
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.