In Re Chapman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that there is no federal constitutional right to counsel on post-conviction review
• no federal constitutional right to counsel in post-conviction review because it is civil proceeding
• no federal constitutional right to counsel in post-conviction review because it is civil proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Metcalf v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1993-12-09· cited 83×
• Conway v. Cumming
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1993-07-09· cited 29×
• In re Gould
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2004-06-04· cited 14×
• Bittick v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2003-04-01· cited 9×
• People v. Richardson
  New York Supreme Court· 1993-09-20· cited 6×
• In re A.B. and A.B.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2013-08-02· cited 2×
• Babson v. State of Vermont
  Vermont Superior Court· 2012-01-06

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anders v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
• Faretta v. California
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
• Gideon v. Wainwright
  Supreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
• Pennsylvania v. Finley
  Supreme Court· 1987-05-18· cited 3,807×
• McKaskle v. Wiggins
  Supreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 2,288×
• United States v. Clifford Bailey, United States of America v. Ronald Clifton Cooley, United States of America v. Ralph Walker
  D.C. Circuit· 1982-04-23· cited 90×
• State v. Ahearn
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1979-05-22· cited 52×
• People v. Duran
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1988-03-03· cited 28×
• State v. O'CONNELL
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1986-03-28· cited 15×
• State v. Hartman
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1975-12-02· cited 10×