New Mexico Supreme Court· 8/25/1937
State v. Ochoa
Citations
- 72 P.2d 609
- 41 N.M. 589
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ―The accused may not be held for the independent act of another even though the same person be the victim of an assault by both.‖
- The accused may not be held for the independent act of another even though the same person be the victim of an assault by both. In such circumstances there is wanting that sharing of criminal intent essential to proof of aiding and abetting.”
- ―The accused may not be held for the independent act of another even though the same person be the victim of an assault by both. In such circumstances there is wanting that sharing of criminal intent essential to proof of aiding and abetting.‖
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bickley, Brice, Hudspeth, Irwin, Moise, Sadler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Santiago Tapia v. Robert TansyTenth Circuit· 1991-03-05· cited 158×
- State v. NanceNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1966-10-10· cited 119×
- State v. CarrascoNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1997-09-03· cited 103×
- State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2004-08-20· cited 89×
- State v. OrtegaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1966-09-06· cited 71×
- State v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2018-02-08· cited 68×
- State v. DominguezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-03-19· cited 64×
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2008-10-09· cited 63×
- State v. OrtizNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1977-04-05· cited 55×
- State v. TurnbowNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1960-07-30· cited 52×
- State v. BankertNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-05-02· cited 47×
- State v. SalazarNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1967-08-28· cited 44×
- State v. HarrisonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1970-02-20· cited 44×
- People v. FinchCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1963-03-12· cited 42×
- Apodaca v. ViramontesNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1949-12-07· cited 41×
- People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court· 1938-12-30· cited 37×
- Michael D. Tann v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-11-19· cited 36×
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-02-03· cited 35×
- State v. GuruleNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1977-01-04· cited 34×
- State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1971-01-22· cited 33×
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1933-05-29· cited 943×
- United States v. MurdockSupreme Court· 1934-01-08· cited 721×
- Starr v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1894-05-14· cited 307×
- Dunbar v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1895-01-28· cited 224×
- Minner v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1932-03-29· cited 84×
- Rudd v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1909-10-28· cited 62×
- Raine v. StateTennessee Supreme Court· 1920-12-15· cited 49×
- Hunter v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1932-12-21· cited 48×
- People v. CioneIllinois Supreme Court· 1920-06-16· cited 46×
- Ratliff v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1918-11-29· cited 36×
- Cook v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1927-03-07· cited 32×
- Weiderman v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1926-02-08· cited 30×
- Watkins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1928-05-25· cited 28×
- Cline v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1927-06-16· cited 23×
- O'SHAUGHNESSY v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1927-02-05· cited 22×
- State v. HernandezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1931-09-28· cited 22×
- State v. PorterSupreme Court of Missouri· 1918-12-23· cited 22×
- Furst v. StateNebraska Supreme Court· 1891-02-17· cited 16×
- Gill v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1930-09-30· cited 15×
- Landrum v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1906-10-11· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.