Supreme Court of Vermont· 2/18/1971
State v. Oakes
Citations
- 276 A.2d 18
- 129 Vt. 241
- 1971 Vt. LEXIS 252
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that opposing counsel has duty to object to claimed prejudicial conduct during jury selection so it may be corrected
- prosecutor’s comments during voir dire and opening statement not error because no showing of prejudice to defendant
- photographs shown to the jury not “prejudicial as a matter of law”
- since objection to improper question was sustained, ruling is not prejudicial
- no errors in charge were “so prejudicial as to require reversal”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holden, Barney, Smith, Keyser, Billings, Supr
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lonquest v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1972-03-23· cited 75×
- State v. BauderSupreme Court of Vermont· 2007-03-16· cited 66×
- State v. LaphamSupreme Court of Vermont· 1977-06-07· cited 59×
- State v. LewisohnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1977-11-08· cited 47×
- People v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado· 1976-12-13· cited 46×
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Vermont· 1996-01-12· cited 44×
- People v. EckstromCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1974-12-18· cited 43×
- In Re MecierSupreme Court of Vermont· 1983-04-05· cited 41×
- Phillips v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1980-11-28· cited 37×
- State v. MinceyArizona Supreme Court· 1977-05-11· cited 33×
- State v. GirouardSupreme Court of Vermont· 1977-03-14· cited 30×
- State v. EmiloSupreme Court of Vermont· 1984-06-08· cited 30×
- State v. PicknellSupreme Court of Vermont· 1982-11-02· cited 29×
- State v. BzdyraSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1973-11-06· cited 27×
- State v. LaBargeSupreme Court of Vermont· 1976-04-06· cited 14×
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Vermont· 1983-03-28· cited 13×
- People v. Superior Court (Henry)California Court of Appeal· 1974-09-05· cited 11×
- People v. WallaceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1973-04-25· cited 10×
- Knight v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1973-02-06· cited 9×
- State v. EmrickSupreme Court of Vermont· 1971-10-05· cited 9×
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 6,512×
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 4,326×
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court· 1967-05-29· cited 3,217×
- Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court· 1969-04-23· cited 1,468×
- Vale v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1970-06-22· cited 1,044×
- Zap v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-10-21· cited 353×
- United States v. Salvatore J. BaroneSecond Circuit· 1964-06-22· cited 166×
- State v. BucanisSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1958-02-03· cited 117×
- Stevens v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1968-07-23· cited 62×
- State v. MinerSupreme Court of Vermont· 1969-10-07· cited 57×
- Recznik v. City of LorainSupreme Court· 1968-11-18· cited 48×
- State v. GosserSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1967-11-27· cited 41×
- State v. SuttonSupreme Court of Missouri· 1970-03-09· cited 40×
- State v. CoburnSupreme Court of Vermont· 1960-11-01· cited 34×
- Parker v. HoeferSupreme Court of Vermont· 1953-10-06· cited 32×
- Killary v. Burlington-Lake Champlain Chamber of Commerce, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1962-11-07· cited 30×
- Power v. GroganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1911-07-06· cited 30×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.