State v. Norris
Citations
- 213 Conn. App. 253
Syllabus
Convicted under two informations of the crimes of risk of injury to a child, assault in the third degree, breach of the peace in the second degree and interfering with an officer, the defendant appealed to this court. The defendant's convictions stemmed from his involvement in a domestic violence incident with his girlfriend, which her minor child witnessed, and from his aggressive behavior with a police officer and hospital staff after he was brought to a hospital following the domestic violence incident. He claimed that the trial court improperly failed to conduct an adequate independent inquiry into his competency to stand trial and to order a competency hearing at the start of trial following a prior evaluation in which he had been found competent to stand trial. He also claimed that the court improperly granted the state's motion for joinder of the cases for trial because the conduct alleged in the domestic violence assault case was significantly more brutal and shocking than the conduct at the hospital alleged in the interfering with an officer case. Held: 1. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant's motion for a competency evaluation or in failing to conduct an indepen- dent inquiry into his competency, the defendant having failed to meet his burden that, at the time he moved for the competency evaluation, the court had before it specific factual allegations that, if true, would have constituted substantial evidence of mental impairment: the court, before ruling on the motion, engaged in extensive dialogue with the defendant, observed his demeanor, took notice of his general pattern of disruptive conduct, reviewed the competency report in the case file, and determined that the defendant was competent to stand trial and that his repeated disruptions and assertions that he did not understand were a delay tactic and specifically referenced the defendant's behavior when denying the motion; moreover, the court concluded that, on the b
Judges: Bright; Clark; DiPentima
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. James A.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-12-19· cited 1×
- State v. RandolphConnecticut Appellate Court· 2024-09-03· cited 1×
- State v. Kenneth K.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2025-05-20· cited 1×
- State v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-09-02· cited 1×
- State v. VickersConnecticut Appellate Court· 2024-10-29
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-04-18· cited 3,197×
- State v. BoscarinoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-08-11· cited 186×
- State v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2012-01-24· cited 144×
- State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-01-23· cited 109×
- State v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-07-27· cited 66×
- State v. DesLaurierSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-08-02· cited 43×
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-03-18· cited 36×
- State v. KendallConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-09-14· cited 32×
- State v. DelgadoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-01-27· cited 26×
- State v. IovienoConnecticut Appellate Court· 1988-06-14· cited 25×
- State v. RodriguezConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-08-30· cited 21×
- State v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court· 1990-07-31· cited 19×
- State v. PaulinoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-03-01· cited 11×
- State v. MordaskyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-08-10· cited 11×
- Stephenson v. Comm'r of Corr.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2018-10-17· cited 7×
- State v. DortConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-10-02· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.