State v. Nordstrom

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting a new trial when the trial justice’s disparaging statements concerning the defendants uttered outside of the courtroom were inconsistent with the impartiality required of judicial officers
• observation by trial judge after presentation of prosecution’s case but before defense that defendants were “bad bastards” required disqualification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Martin
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1984-07-25· cited 152×
• Booth v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-06-24· cited 66×
• Ryan v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Providence
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2008-02-08· cited 63×
• State v. Romano
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1983-02-21· cited 56×
• Mattatall v. State
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2008-05-29· cited 40×
• State v. Nordstrom
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1987-07-06· cited 34×
• Brown v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1991-08-23· cited 31×
• Champlin's Realty Associates v. Tikoian
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2010-02-18· cited 24×
• Estep v. Hardeman
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1985-09-03· cited 18×
• State v. McWilliams
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2012-07-05· cited 10×
• State v. Howard
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2011-06-29· cited 6×
• State v. Gil
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1988-06-15· cited 5×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Stamp v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1922-06-23· cited 22×
• State v. Nunes
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1964-12-04· cited 16×