Skip to main content
· 2/24/2009

Champlin's Realty Associates v. Tikoian

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming dismissal and noting the charge described disparate treatment and not disparate impact
  • “Abdus-Shahid . . . failed to exhaust his administrative remedies with respect to a disparate impact claim under Title VII and the district court did not err in dismissing this claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: VOGEL, J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.