· 2/24/2009
Champlin's Realty Associates v. Tikoian
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming dismissal and noting the charge described disparate treatment and not disparate impact
- “Abdus-Shahid . . . failed to exhaust his administrative remedies with respect to a disparate impact claim under Title VII and the district court did not err in dismissing this claim.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: VOGEL, J.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.