State v. Noble

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing the common law and statutory contempt provisions that predated the adoption of the Oregon Constitution
• affidavit not required if facts supporting probable cause occur in presence of court
• affirming vitality of common-law principles underlying courts’ direct contempt power
• “[W]e hold that Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution requires that, before a bench warrant for the arrest of a person may issue for any conduct other than conduct occurring in the presence of the court (as we have explained that concept

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rodriguez
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 138×
• State v. Davidson
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2000-09-29· cited 28×
• State v. Spainhower
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-07-05· cited 19×
• State v. Perrodin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-10-20· cited 8×
• State v. Ferguson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-03-14· cited 6×
• State v. Hoskinson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-09-22· cited 2×
• State v. Mohs
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-01-10· cited 1×
• State v. Beckstead
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-12-29· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ex Parte Terry
  Supreme Court· 1888-11-12· cited 567×
• State v. Kennedy
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 519×
• State v. Hansen
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-09-29· cited 156×
• Utley v. City of Independence
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1965-06-05· cited 31×
• Jaehne v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1888-11-12· cited 21×
• State v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-04-12· cited 7×
• State v. Noble
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-12-17· cited 6×