State v. Noble

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It would be anomalous to conclude that the framers contemplated that a court, acting under the solemn obligation imposed by its oath of office, would be required to affirm by oath or affirmation the validity of its own records.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rodriguez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-01-08· cited 11×
• State v. Noble
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-11-25· cited 11×
• State v. Hoskinson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-09-22· cited 2×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McGrain v. Daugherty
  Supreme Court· 1927-01-17· cited 449×
• State v. Caraher
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1982-11-02· cited 274×
• State v. Ainsworth
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-11-26· cited 84×
• State v. Ridderbush
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-12-19· cited 39×
• State v. Mundt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-09-13· cited 30×
• State v. Schellhorn
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-02-22· cited 24×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-08-15· cited 18×
• Higgins v. Redding
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-06-20· cited 17×
• State v. Jones
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-09-05· cited 14×
• State v. Roque-Escamilla
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-03-06· cited 7×
• State v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-04-12· cited 7×