State v. Hunter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a jury 8 may simply choose to believe the testimony of the victim over that of the defendant
• “[I]n a prosecution for criminal sexual penetration, the testimony of the victim need not be corroborated and the lack of corroboration has no bearing on the weight to be given the testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Nichols
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2005-12-08· cited 64×
• State v. Ervin
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2007-10-10· cited 26×
• State v. Watchman
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2005-09-23· cited 23×
• State v. Chavez
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2007-10-11· cited 13×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. McAfee
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 72×
• State v. Lard
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1974-01-23· cited 37×
• State v. Lucero
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1975-10-09· cited 35×
• State v. Torres
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1967-12-01· cited 35×