State v. Newton

Citations

• 2019 Ohio 3566

Syllabus

Motion to suppress Terry stop warrant affidavit Franks challenge ineffective assistance of counsel sufficiency of the evidence engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity manifest weight of the evidence restitution vindictive sentence. The trial court's denial of the motion to suppress was proper where the stop was a valid investigative stop based on a reasonable articulable suspicion of criminal activity, and a warrant affidavit was supported by probable cause. Newton's convictions were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court's imposition of restitution was proper. Newton's sentence was not contrary to law.