State v. Nevarez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A police officer is not per se ‘interested’ merely by virtue of his involvement in the criminal investigation, absent evidence of some personal connection with the participants or personal stake in the outcome of the case.“

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Eddington
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-12-17· cited 21×
• State v. Miller
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-05-28· cited 14×
• State of Arizona v. Douglas Lee Eddington
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-12-17

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Bible
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1993-08-12· cited 658×
• State v. Reynolds
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1992-01-07· cited 64×
• State v. Tapia
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1988-12-08· cited 39×
• State v. Allred
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1982-11-09· cited 33×
• State v. Aldrich
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1952-12-22· cited 15×
• State v. Beck
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-05-22· cited 13×
• State v. Warner
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1988-11-08· cited 8×
• State v. Small
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1973-09-27· cited 7×