Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1/12/2006

State v. Nesbitt

Citations

888 A.2d 472
185 N.J. 504
2006 N.J. LEXIS 7

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

discussing court’s duty to perform gatekeeper role in determining whether testimony is reasonably needed and is not unduly prejudicial
discussing court's duty to perform gatekeeper role in determining whether testimony is reasonably needed and is not unduly prejudicial
affirming the defendant's conviction but noting that the hypothetical posed to the narcotics expert improperly used the \precise term\ from the criminal statute
upholding a conviction for drug distribution where the defendant did not personally give the drugs to the buyer or personally accept the payment from the buyer
noting Odom permitted the State to pose a hypothetical question to a drug expert that mirrored the facts of the case even if \expressed in terms of 19 A-4012-14T2 ultimate issues of fact\
\We do not presume that ordinary members of the public ... are versed in the many ways in which a seller of crack cocaine can act in concert with others in the business of distributing drugs on the street\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lavecchia, Albin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.