United States v. Michael Barile

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that FDA documents containing a witness’s prior inconsistent statement may be admitted to impeach a witness but only after the court determines that the witness “has adopted the statements or whether they can be otherwise attributed to her”
• distinguishing between (a) questions that are broadly phrased and use words with specialized legal meanings and therefore could elicit a legal as well as a fact-based response and (b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).