State v. Yasin Simms(074209)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant in a securities action was entitled to a jury trial on liability, but not on the amount of civil penalties
• concluding that although defendant in securities-fraud suit was entitled to have liability determined by a jury, “he was not entitled to have the jury decide the remedies”
• rejecting argument that district court erred by using “a general verdict form that simply asked whether or not the securities laws were violated” (quotation marks omitted)
• defendant in securities action was entitled to a jury trial on liability but not on the amount of civil penalties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).