Skip to main content

State v. Nelson

Citations

  • 4 Conn. App. 514
  • 495 A.2d 298
  • 1985 Conn. App. LEXIS 1057

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting claim that \in-court identification was impermissibly suggestive since the defendant was the only black male present in the courtroom\ because it was otherwise reliable
  • rejecting claim that ‘‘in-court identifi- cation was impermissibly suggestive since the defendant was the only black male present in the courtroom’’ because it was otherwise reliable
  • where there had been no pretrial out-of-court identification procedure, there was no basis to suppress eyewitness' in-court identification because there would have been nothing to taint it
  • where there had been no pretrial out-of-court identification procedure, there was no basis to suppress eyewitness’ in-court identifica- tion because there would have been nothing to taint it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Daly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.