Court of Appeals of Washington· 10/25/2001
State v. Nelson
Citations
- 33 P.3d 419
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that statement made by defendant in reliance on withdrawn plea agreement was inadmissible at subsequent trial
- res judicata inapplicable because an evidentiary ruling is not a final judgment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- State v. PowellWashington Supreme Court· 1995-04-13· cited 542×
- State v. BourgeoisWashington Supreme Court· 1997-11-06· cited 336×
- Hutto v. RossSupreme Court· 1976-11-01· cited 321×
- Willener v. SweetingWashington Supreme Court· 1986-12-11· cited 201×
- Loveridge v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1995-01-26· cited 139×
- State v. VreenWashington Supreme Court· 2001-06-21· cited 63×
- Harris by and Through Ramseyer v. BlodgettW.D. Washington· 1994-05-17· cited 52×
- State v. ReubenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1991-08-27· cited 45×
- State v. VreenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-03-09· cited 28×
- Vermette v. AndersenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1976-11-30· cited 25×
- State v. KinardCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-02-28· cited 21×
- State v. JolloCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-08-06· cited 11×
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-10-25· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.