State v. Neese

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A valid consent to search eliminates the need for either probable cause or a search warrant.”
• \A valid consent to search eliminates the need for either probable cause or a search warrant.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rainey v. the State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-07-13· cited 3×
• State v. Lamonda
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2011-09-08· cited 2×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Corley
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1991-09-25· cited 41×
• State v. Jourdan
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-11-13· cited 36×
• State v. Diaz
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-06-06· cited 34×
• Springsteen v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-11-03· cited 30×
• Taylor v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-02-24· cited 30×
• Brooks v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2009-04-28· cited 27×
• Amato v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-11-09· cited 25×
• Pincherli v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-12-31· cited 20×
• Chastain v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-05-25· cited 11×
• Semelis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-10-15· cited 11×
• McNeil v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-02-01· cited 10×
• State v. Fulghum
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-12-04· cited 9×
• State v. Goode
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-07-07· cited 9×
• Davis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-04-03· cited 7×