McNeil v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• intrusiveness of search conducted pursuant to consent is limited by permission granted, and only that which is reasonably understood from the consent maybe undertaken
• intrusiveness of search conducted pursuant to consent is limited by permission granted, and only that which is reasonably understood from the consent may be undertaken
• “The intrusiveness of the search is limited by the permission granted, and only that which is reasonably understood from the consent may be undertaken.” (footnote omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Austin
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-07-13· cited 23×
• Hawkins v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-12-01· cited 12×
• State v. Fulghum
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-12-04· cited 9×
• Stovall v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-07-31· cited 9×
• State v. Neese
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-03-12· cited 6×
• Berry v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-11-27· cited 6×
• Terrence Berry v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-11-27

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mathis v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1968-05-06· cited 760×
• Springsteen v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-11-03· cited 30×
• Davis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-03-31· cited 21×
• McGaughey v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-08-13· cited 19×
• Maxwell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-11-19· cited 3×
• State v. Varner
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-07-28· cited 3×