Skip to main content

State v. Goode

Citations

  • 681 S.E.2d 199
  • 298 Ga. App. 749
  • 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 2434
  • 2009 Ga. App. LEXIS 780

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant’s strong odor of alcohol, glassy and watery eyes, admission to drinking, and positive alcosensor tests did not require a finding of impairment
  • defendant’s strong odor of alcohol, glassy and watery eyes, admission to drinking, and positive alco-sensor tests did not require a finding of impairment
  • “Where, as here, the underlying facts support conflicting inferences as to whether the defendant was an impaired driver, we apply a clearly erroneous standard of review and defer to the trial court’s finding on the issue.” (Citation omitted)
  • “Where, as here, the underlying facts support conflicting inferences as to whether the defendant was an impaired driver, we apply a clearly erroneous standard of review and defer to the trial court’s finding on the issue.” (Citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bernes, Smith, Phipps

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.