Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 4/24/1986

State v. Nease

Citations

713 S.W.2d 90
1986 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 2294

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that a defendant’s lack of candor and lack of accountability prevented him from being considered a good candidate for pretrial -9- diversion, despite his positive social history
holding that a defendant’s failure to be completely truthful about the circumstances of the crime committed and to take full responsibility made the defendant a poor candidate for diversion
holding the defendant to be a poor candidate for diversion because he was not completely truthful about what occurred and did not accept full responsibility
holding the defendant to be a poor candidate for diversion because he was not completely truthful about what occurred and did not accept full responsibility
remorse not a factor to be considered in determining suitability for pretrial diversion
defendant who was untruthful with trial court appropriately denied diversion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Byers, Daughtrey, Tatum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.