State v. Nease

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a defendant’s lack of candor and lack of accountability prevented him from being considered a good candidate for pretrial -9- diversion, despite his positive social history
• holding that a defendant’s failure to be completely truthful about the circumstances of the crime committed and to take full responsibility made the defendant a poor candidate for diversion
• holding the defendant to be a poor candidate for diversion because he was not completely truthful about what occurred and did not accept full responsibility
• holding the defendant to be a poor candidate for diversion because he was not completely truthful about what occurred and did not accept full responsibility
• remorse not a factor to be considered in determining suitability for pretrial diversion
• defendant who was untruthful with trial court appropriately denied diversion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).