Skip to main content

Citations

  • 56 S.W.3d 20
  • 2000 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 436
  • 2000 WL 709152

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that deterrence was not a valid basis to support the prosecutor’s denial of pretrial diversion because, inter alia, perjury is not statutorily excluded from consideration for pretrial diversion
  • holding that an admission of guilt may not be a prerequisite to pretrial diversion
  • finding the need for deterrence improperly applied in case where prosecutor failed to elucidate the factual basis and rationale for the need to deter crimes of perjury
  • “[O]ff-duty acts that are unrelated to this defendant’s duties of public employment are not a proper basis for imposing a higher standard of conduct and thereby justifying a denial of pretrial diversion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Witt, Riley, Woodall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.