Supreme Court of South Carolina· 7/2/1990
State v. Murrell
Citations
- 393 S.E.2d 919
- 302 S.C. 77
- 1990 S.C. LEXIS 145
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding a trial judge must make a case-specific determination of the need for videotaped testimony in a child sexual assault case
- trial court’s decision to use alternative procedure reviewed under abuse of discretion standard
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harwell, Gregory, Chandler, Finney, Toal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- South Carolina Department of Social Services v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-12-16· cited 22×
- State v. LopezSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-12-09· cited 17×
- State v. BraySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-07-31· cited 11×
- State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-10-29· cited 9×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-01-30· cited 8×
- In Interest of Cisco K.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-10-12· cited 5×
- State v. BrayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-11-05· cited 3×
- In the Interest of Robert D.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-04-10· cited 2×
- South Carolina Department of Social Services v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-07-17· cited 2×
- State v. WestCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1993-11-03· cited 1×
- State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2021-04-07
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.