Skip to main content

State v. Bray

Citations

  • 535 S.E.2d 636
  • 342 S.C. 23
  • 2000 S.C. LEXIS 173

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • it is error for an appellate court to consider issues not raised to it
  • it is error for an appellate court to consider issues not raised to it
  • \A trial court's decision to allow videotaped or closed-circuit testimony is reversible 'only if it is shown that the trial judge abused his discretion in making such a decision[.]'\ (quoting State v. Murrell, 302 S.C. 77, 82, 393 S.E.2d 919, 922 (1990))
  • \A trial court's decision to allow videotaped or closed-circuit testimony is reversible 'only if it is shown that the trial judge abused his discretion in making such a decision [.] . . .'\ (quoting State v. Murrell, 302 S.C. 77, 82, 393 S.E.2d 919, 922 (1990))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Waller, Moore, Burnett, Pleicones, Toal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.