Supreme Court of South Carolina· 11/9/1987

State v. Rogers

Citations

362 S.E.2d 7
293 S.C. 505
1987 S.C. LEXIS 344

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that where the acts are ten years apart and the only connection between the testimony of the two daughters was that the defendant touched them both, the prior bad act evidence should have been excluded
rev’d on other grounds by State v. Schumpert, 312 S.C. 502, 435 S.E.2d 859 (1993)
trial court’s general remarks about children feeling uncomfortable testifying in open court in these types of cases were insufficient
the fact that children generally feel uncomfortable testifying in open court found to be inadequate
Hudnall rule holds that evidence “of behavioral traits of a sexual abuse child victim ... is not admissible where it serves only to bolster the child’s testimony that the crime occurred.”
general remarks about children feeling uncomfortable testifying in open court are inadequate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ness, Gregory, Harwell, Chandler, Finney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.