Washington Supreme Court· 1/4/1979

State v. Murdock

Citations

588 P.2d 1143
91 Wash. 2d 336
1979 Wash. LEXIS 1156

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that every element in a habitual criminal proceeding must be established beyond a reasonable doubt
holding that every element in a habitual criminal proceeding must be established beyond a reasonable doubt
holding that the burden is on the state to prove the fact of prior convictions beyond a reasonable doubt, citing In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 90 S.Ct. 1068, 25 L.Ed.2d 368 (1970)
holding that the burden is on the state to prove the fact of prior convictions beyond a reasonable doubt, citing In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 90 S. Ct. 1068, 25 L. Ed. 2d 368 (1970)
elements of habitual criminal statute must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt
elements of habitual criminal statute must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Horowitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.