State v. Munro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• expert’s proffered testimony concerning effect of victim’s emotional and mental state on her ability to tell the truth was properly excluded, because it could be fairly characterized as an opinion on the veracity of the particular victim
• witness cannot comment on credibility of another witness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Remme
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-04-25· cited 29×
• State v. Gherasim
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1999-07-29· cited 11×
• State v. Padilla
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-08-07· cited 4×
• State v. Dale
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-10-02· cited 3×
• Zacher v. Petty
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-08-08· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Middleton
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1983-01-18· cited 320×
• State v. Walgraeve
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1966-03-16· cited 32×
• State v. Harwood
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-04-21· cited 30×