State v. Padilla

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• an expert may not testify that a witness is telling the truth but may state that a witness has the ability to perceive, remember, or relate
• expert testimony concerning victim’s ability to perceive and relate a sexual contact was not an opinion on whether the victim would testify truthfully and was admissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Moor v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1985-11-08· cited 37×
• State v. Dale
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-10-02· cited 3×
• Zacher v. Petty
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-08-08· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Middleton
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1983-01-18· cited 320×
• State v. Harwood
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-04-21· cited 30×
• State v. Mustain
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-01-11· cited 11×
• State v. Munro
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-05-09· cited 6×
• State v. John
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-12-11· cited 2×