State Highway Commission v. Callahan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• arguments that are “highly inflammatory * * * and had no reasonable relevance” to the issues in the case are improper
• arguments that are \highly inflammatory * * * and had no reasonable relevance\ to the issues in the case are improper
• “Admissibility of evidence of sales of other land is largely within the discretion of the trial court.”
• inflammatory arguments encourage jury to decide case on improper basis and are impermissible
• “justice demands that arguments be factual and not inflammatoiy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).