Skip to main content

State v. Mullins

Citations

  • 383 S.E.2d 47
  • 181 W. Va. 415
  • 1989 W. Va. LEXIS 121

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that we require indictments to “substantially follow” statutory language, although they need “not strictly spell out statutory requirements^]” (Emphasis in original)
  • where both defendants had alibi defenses, “their interests were more compatible as opposed to conflicting” and counsel did not have an actual conflict of interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McHUGH

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.