State v. Petrice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prosecutor’s inappropriate comments were not sufficient alone to justify verdict reversal
• finding that two and one-half year delay did not require dismissal of indictment
• refusing to dismiss the indictment because although the delay of two and one-half years is prima facie excessive, the State showed that the delay was not “a deliberate device to gain an advantage over” the defendant
• prosecutor’s comments, although inappropriate, were not sufficient alone to justify reversal of verdict
• a two and one-half-year delay between arrest and indictment was prima facie excessive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).