State v. Guy
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 4836
Syllabus
Convictions for heroin trafficking, heroin possession, and kidnapping were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence where detective's eyewitness testimony plus other evidence established appellant was the individual who committed the offenses. Although appellant's alibi witnesses provided contrary testimony regarding appellant's whereabouts at the time of some of the offenses, the jury did not clearly lose its way in finding appellant guilty.
Judges: Dorrian
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CervantesOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-04-11· cited 22×
- State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-11-14· cited 11×
- State v. PoindexterOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-29· cited 10×
- State v. GearOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-04-17· cited 10×
- State v. SchulmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-08-20· cited 9×
- State v. JozwiakOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-07-13· cited 8×
- State v. DanielsOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-09· cited 7×
- State v. PeoplesOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-24· cited 7×
- State v. HawkinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-24· cited 3×
- State v. SylvesterOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-10-25· cited 3×
- State v. MuhammadOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-30· cited 2×
- State v. FergusonOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-17· cited 2×
- State v. RobyOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-12-21· cited 1×
- State v. ChappleOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-06-13· cited 1×
- State v. ParoOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-12-09
- State v. QuigleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-07-29
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.