Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2/20/1986
State v. Mounce
Citations
- 721 P.2d 661
- 150 Ariz. 3
- 1986 Ariz. App. LEXIS 492
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- indicating that the Double Jeopardy Clauses of both the United States and Arizona Constitutions bar a subsequent prosecution for a greater offense once the defendant has been tried for a lesser-included offense
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hathaway, Howard, Fernandez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 4,277×
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 3,552×
- Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1937-12-06· cited 2,059×
- Illinois v. VitaleSupreme Court· 1980-06-19· cited 1,215×
- Hoag v. New JerseySupreme Court· 1958-05-19· cited 314×
- Brock v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1953-02-02· cited 169×
- Ciucci v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1958-05-19· cited 136×
- State v. LaffoonArizona Supreme Court· 1980-04-21· cited 58×
- State v. HarveyArizona Supreme Court· 1965-05-12· cited 11×
- Hoag v. New JerseySupreme Court· 1958-06-23· cited 9×
- State v. SeatsArizona Supreme Court· 1981-12-15· cited 8×
- State v. LagunaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-11-02· cited 3×
- Ciucci v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1958-06-23· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.