Pcolar v. Casella Waste Systems and Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a trial judge had not abused their discretion in denying plaintiff’s motion as untimely as plaintiff had “been aware of the need to proceed on [a set date] . . . for a long time”
• holding that a trial judge had not abused their discretion in denying plaintiff’s motion as untimely as plaintiff had “been aware of the need to proceed on [a set date] . . . for a long time”
• holding plaintiff's two-sentence statement that judge erred by not providing requested discovery was inadequate briefing for review, even given the \wider leeway afforded to pro se litigants\ (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).