State v. Arbeitman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting vagueness and overbreadth challenges to \[o]bstructs ... pedestrian traffic\ provision of 13 V.S.A. § 1026(5)
• rejecting vagueness and over-breadth challenges to “[o]bstructs. . . pedestrian traffic” provision of 13 V.S.A. § 1026(5)
• no prejudice where allegedly improper comment made by prosecution in open court was made in anticipation of a question by defense counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).