State v. Mills

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Under the restitution statutes, whether an insurance company’s decision was a reasonable busi- ness decision does not answer—at least not in every case— whether the state provided sufficient evidence to establish a victim’s economic damages under ORS 137.106(1).”
• “Under the restitution statutes, whether an insurance company’s decision was a reasonable busi- ness decision does not answer—at least not in every case— whether the state provided sufficient evidence to establish a victim’s economic damages under ORS 137.106(1).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pereida-Alba v. Coursey
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2015-01-15· cited 82×
• State v. Aguirre-Rodriguez
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2021-03-04· cited 37×
• State v. Pool
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-02-20· cited 11×
• State v. Boyar
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-10-18· cited 10×
• State v. Morgan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-09-30· cited 7×